Each call is scored 0-100 against your profile. See strengths, weaknesses, and whether it's worth investing hours in the application.
Official Gazette Surveillance
BDNS · DOGC · BOE · PLACSP
Eligibility Determination
Law 38/2003 · Rubric 0-100
Technical Proposal .docx
Logical Framework · WP1-WP5
Select your organization profile to view how the system processes official grant resolutions:
Clause § 4.2: Audited 3+ year financial statements with no tax liabilities.
Clause § 6.1: Permanent technical staff and verified regional presence.
Clause § 8.3: 24.5% own contribution backed by foundation private reserves.
Clause § 11.2: Evaluative methodology with auditable verification sources.
Document engineering workflow: from gazette ingestion to Word proposal compilation and audit traceability.
Automated ingestion of official tender notices from BDNS, BOE, Regional Gazettes, PLACSP, and EU TED. Normalization of administrative metadata (BDNS ID, issuing department, competitive regime, deadlines, and budget ceilings).
Semantic chunking and tokenization of regulatory specs and administrative annexes. Automated extraction of statutory exclusion grounds (Spanish Subsidy Law 38/2003 art. 13) and public scoring rubrics.
Algorithmic cross-referencing against non-profit track record: technical solvency, audited financial capacity, liquidity ratios, and territorial footprint. Issue of motivated Go / No-Go / Cure determination.
Generation of complete technical proposals aligned with official formats: Logical Framework Matrix (LFM), Work Packages (WP1-WP5), SMART indicators, and eligible expense tables. [PER COMPLETAR] placeholders for private facts.
Data contract and statutory standards governing public grant proposal assembly.
| Parameter | Type / Format | Statutory Source | Role in File |
|---|---|---|---|
| bdns_code | string (ID / CVE) | BDNS / Official Gazettes | Unique registration code in the National Grant Advertising Database. |
| regulatory_spec_pdf | binary / pdf / text | Official Gazettes | Complete administrative guidelines containing evaluation rubrics, eligible costs, and calendars. |
| entity_solvency_profile | schema (JSON) | Law 38/2003 art. 13 | Registered bylaws, tax compliance clearance (AEAT), and Social Security clearance (TGSS). |
| audited_financial_records | record (Balance / P&L) | Foundation / Assoc. Register | Operational budget volume and equity reserves required to establish statutory economic capacity. |
| budget_and_cofinancing | currency / table | Specific call guidelines | Itemized direct personnel costs, operational expenses, and eligible indirect overheads. |
Unique registration code in the National Grant Advertising Database.
Complete administrative guidelines containing evaluation rubrics, eligible costs, and calendars.
Registered bylaws, tax compliance clearance (AEAT), and Social Security clearance (TGSS).
Operational budget volume and equity reserves required to establish statutory economic capacity.
Itemized direct personnel costs, operational expenses, and eligible indirect overheads.
| Deliverable | Output Format | Audit Standard | Usage in Tender |
|---|---|---|---|
| eligibility_determination | enum (GO | NO_GO | CURE) | Law 38/2003 Grounds | Justified legal determination citing exact articles and paragraphs in the regulatory base. |
| rubric_scoring_0_100 | float (0.00 - 100.00) | Public evaluation rubric | Weighted scoring breakdown (technical capacity, methodology, social impact, budget viability). |
| proposal_draft_docx | file (.docx OOXML) | Issuing body template | Complete proposal document with Logical Framework (LFM), Work Packages (WP1-WP5), and placeholders. |
| smart_indicator_table | table (Goals / OVI / Sources) | Public evaluation standard | Continuous monitoring ledger with verifiable documentary sources for justification. |
| audit_sha256_hash | hex string (256-bit) | Evaluation Body / Audit Office | Cryptographic hash ensuring end-to-end data integrity across evaluation proceedings. |
Justified legal determination citing exact articles and paragraphs in the regulatory base.
Weighted scoring breakdown (technical capacity, methodology, social impact, budget viability).
Complete proposal document with Logical Framework (LFM), Work Packages (WP1-WP5), and placeholders.
Continuous monitoring ledger with verifiable documentary sources for justification.
Cryptographic hash ensuring end-to-end data integrity across evaluation proceedings.
Compare fragmented manual procedures against FundingQuarry's unified grant operating platform.
Optimized operational capacity verified across non-profit teams and public grant workflows.
Analyze 80-page administrative specs and receive an instant structured score matrix.
Focus your writing resources on grants where your fit score exceeds 75/100.
Every point in the score cites the exact paragraph in official regulations.
Explore how this module applies to specific non-profit sectors and operational models.
It compares your organization's history with official tender criteria and shows a clear 0-100 score.
It doesn't guarantee final approval, but it drastically increases your odds by avoiding non-eligible applications.
Yes, Professional and Enterprise plans allow custom weighting for financial capacity or staffing.
All data is hosted in EU data centers with AES-256 encryption and is never used to train public AI models.
Yes, you can upload any PDF or Word tender document for instant fit scoring.
Scan your non-profit profile for free or schedule a guided technical session with a public funding specialist.
