Skip to content
FundingQuarry LogoFundingQuarry
NewOver 12,000 grant calls analyzed every week for Third Sector teams.Learn more

PUBLIC GRANT INTELLIGENCE & MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR NON-PROFITS

Never miss a funding call or draft a grant proposal blind again

FundingQuarry continuously monitors official gazettes (BDNS, DOGC, BOE, TED), evaluates regulatory fit against your bylaws, and generates structured .docx drafts.

1,480+ Active Grants
100% Official Sources
Daily Sync at 06:00 UTC
Auditable .docx Format
https://app.fundingquarry.com/matchings
Fundació Horitzons Socials

Grant Opportunity Alerts

3 new · €185,000 potential · Next update: Mon Sep 7
94
New · 29 ago 2026•Departament de Drets Socials - Generalitat de Catalunya
AI Alignment Rationale: 94% match alignment with statutory scope, accredited youth programs in Barcelona, and manageable co-funding ratio.
€75,00018 days left
88
In progress · 25 ago 2026•Diputació de Barcelona
AI Alignment Rationale: Requires accredited presence in Barcelona province and active community volunteering. 100% technical solvency met.
€35,0006 days left
85
New · 21 ago 2026•Ministeri de Drets Socials (NextGenerationEU)
AI Alignment Rationale: 100% funding for IT equipment renewal and document management software. Fully eligible as non-profit foundation.
€50,00042 days left

Official public sources and bulletins monitored in real time

BDNSBase Nacional Subvenciones
DOGCGeneralitat de Catalunya
BCN / DIBAAjuntament & Diputació
SEDIA / TEDFons Europeus (UE)
PLACSPContratación del Estado
BOE / CC.AA.Boletines Oficiales

How we work

Information you can check

A grant call is useful when you can return to its original terms and see which facts are still unknown.

Original source

Public calls link to their original notice so you can review the official terms.

Unknowns stay visible

If a source has no published deadline or budget, we say so without estimating a figure.

Your team's decision

Review eligibility and every draft against the official terms before submitting an application.

Browse grant calls
OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT MATRIX

Traditional Model vs FundingQuarry Platform

Manual grant tracking drains valuable technical hours. Compare actual costs, turnaround speeds, and success metrics.

Weekly prospecting hours

Traditional Model (Excel + Alerts + Consultancies)
8 to 15 hours per officer
FundingQuarry Platform
Under 1 hour per week

Official gazette monitoring

Traditional Model (Excel + Alerts + Consultancies)
Manual, fragmented, and intermittent
FundingQuarry Platform
Automated daily (06:00 UTC)

Eligibility fit assessment

Traditional Model (Excel + Alerts + Consultancies)
Manual reading of 80-page pliegos
FundingQuarry Platform
0-100 Score and Go/No-Go report

Risk of missed deadlines

Traditional Model (Excel + Alerts + Consultancies)
High (unnotified guideline amendments)
FundingQuarry Platform
Proactive multichannel deadline alerts

Technical proposal drafting

Traditional Model (Excel + Alerts + Consultancies)
From scratch or outdated recycled templates
FundingQuarry Platform
Structured .docx draft matching criteria

Estimated monthly cost

Traditional Model (Excel + Alerts + Consultancies)
>€1,200 in internal staff hours
FundingQuarry Platform
From €299 / month flat rate

Success commission fees

Traditional Model (Excel + Alerts + Consultancies)
€1,500/mo retainer + 10-15% win fee
FundingQuarry Platform
Zero win fees (100% funds stay with NGO)
DIRECT EFFICIENCY: +540 technical hours saved / year

Free your team from manual search and focus internal time on social impact delivery.

Impact Estimate Ledger

How much grant funding can your non-profit unlock?

Indicative estimate of hours saved and funding potential. Compare it with Professional plan cost.

Input ledger · Entity Profile

8 proposals
2 grants/yr25+ grants/yr
35.000 €
10.000 €150.000 €
Estimated Annual Impact
Potential Unlocked Funding
+ 151.200 €/ yr

Professional plan annual cost (ref.): 5,988 € · Estimated multiple: 25.3x

Time Saved Drafting Proposals
256 hours/ yr

Indicative estimate of hours recoverable in research and drafting (typical usage assumption).

Assumptions

Estimate based on typical usage assumptions. Not guaranteed results or official grant-call data.

AUDITED OPERATIONAL ENGINE · TECHNICAL ARCHITECTURE

Tender ingestion and administrative generation architecture

Directly connected to official grant gazettes across Catalonia, Spain, and the European Union to eliminate administrative uncertainty.

Official sources connected in real time

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE
BDNS

National Grants Database (Spain)

Official REST API

Calls listed by the source
DOGC & BOE

Regional & State Official Gazettes

Legal resolution OCR & parsing

Published resolutions and terms
PLACSP

Public Sector Procurement Platform

Reserved contracts and tenders

Social clauses & Third Sector
TED & NextGenEU

Tenders Electronic Daily / European Funds

EU calls and RRF recovery funds

European Social Fund Plus (ESF+)
MODULE 01 · REGULATORY ELIGIBILITY ENGINE

Admissibility verification against tender requirements

Automated check against regulatory bases and the General Subsidies Act before investing valuable technical team hours.

Regulatory compliance checklist (Bases + LGS 38/2003)ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE
Art. 13 Law 38/2003 (LGS)Example

Absence of disqualifying grounds for public subsidies

Example data: Accredited (AEAT and Social Security certificates valid)

Regulatory Basis Art. 4Example

Legal status as a non-profit association or foundation

Example data: Accredited (Entity Registry registration no. 4,120)

Technical Solvency CriterionExample

Documented 3-year track record in similar programs

Example data: Satisfied (5 years accredited with active agreements)

Art. 29 LGS (Subcontracting)Example

Subcontracting cap strictly below 50%

Example data: Compliant (Project structured with 38% subcontracting)

Minimum Co-financingExample

Minimum 10% co-funding through own/private funds

Example data: Verified (15% guaranteed through internal resources)

REGULATORY AUDIT: 5/5 CRITERIA PASSED · FORMAL RISK: LOW
MODULE 02 · STRUCTURED TECHNICAL WRITING

Standardized Word (.docx) proposal generator

Assisted technical drafting based on your organization's verified profile, mapped line by line against the official evaluation grid.

TECHNICAL_MEMORANDUM_DSO_2026.docx
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE

Structure aligned with Order DSO/124/2026 and DOGC no. 9114

1. Institutional entity overview and accredited solvencyExample
2. Logical framework: Objectives, activities, value chainExample
3. Work packages (WP1 to WP4) with delivery timelineExample
4. Impact indicators and KPIs [PER COMPLETAR: baseline]Pending
5. Detailed budget broken down by eligible direct costsPending
DOCUMENT SECURITY: Zero invented facts. [PER COMPLETAR] security tags for unverified local data.

Tender assessment

Assisted

human review required

Official criteria

Traceable

check the original terms

Editable export format

.docx / PDF

subject to the document

See the privacy policy for details on data handling.

Request Free Sample Report
TECHNICAL PRODUCT DOCUMENTATION · OPERATIONAL ARCHITECTURE GUIDEREF: FQ-METHODOLOGY-2026 · AUDITED VERSION

Three-phase methodology: from official gazette to verified technical proposal

A unified workflow for Third Sector entities replacing scattered administrative portals with a structured, auditable, and legally verified procedure.

Executive Summary: FundingQuarry acts as an admissibility gateway between official gazettes and technical teams in NGOs and foundations. It automates ingestion, scores tender alignment against statutory grids, and structures technical documentation without unverified figures.
PHASE 01 · MONITORING & STATUTORY INGESTION
OFFICIAL FEEDS BDNS, DOGC, BOE, PLACSP & TED

Proactive detection and admissibility triage across official gazettes

Third Sector management teams spend an average of 14 hours per month reviewing gazettes and scattered public portals. FundingQuarry centralizes ingestion via daily connectors and legal document parsing.

The system goes beyond surface keyword matching: it crosses corporate status, technical solvency, and territorial scope prerequisites from the tender against your verified profile before alerting your team.

Garanties tècniques auditades

  • Continuous indexing of over 8,400 active public grant calls
  • Automated admissibility triage (legal form, operating track record, and territory)
  • Document traceability linked directly to BDNS code and official gazette issues

OFFICIAL CALLS & GAZETTES CONSOLE

42 OFFICIAL SOURCES · ACTIVE LINK
BDNS: 742198 · DOGC no. 9114 · Entry 2026/04/311BELIGIBLE · PRIORITY

Grants for social-labour insertion projects and vulnerable group support

Department of Social Rights and Inclusion · Government of Catalonia

Dotació: 450,000 € (ESF+)|Deadline: 14 days (28/10/2026)
Score 92/100View technical opinion
BDNS: 739401 · BOPB CVE: 202610042 · Order DSO/124/2026FAVORABLE

Call for community innovation and local care projects in the Third Sector

Social Cohesion Area · Barcelona Provincial Council

Dotació: 120,000 € (Own funds)|Deadline: 22 days (05/11/2026)
Score 86/100View technical opinion
BDNS: 751029 · BOE no. 240 · PRTR Component 22REQUIREMENTS REVIEW

NextGenerationEU grants for digital transformation in social action entities

Ministry of Social Rights · EU RRF Funds

Dotació: 85,000 € (PRTR)|Deadline: 31 days (14/11/2026)
Score 78/100View technical opinion
Protocol: BDNS/REST v2.4 · SHA-256 ValidatSynchronized 14 mins ago
PHASE 02 · EVALUATION MATRIX & MERIT OPINION
WEIGHTED SCORING GRID BASED ON REGULATORY BASES

Eligibility assessment and win probability verdict (Score 0-100)

Uncertainty in competitive calls frequently causes teams to submit proposals where award criteria are unmet. The evaluation engine breaks down the tender scoring grid into objective parameters.

Each criterion (technical solvency, methodological coherence, budget efficiency) is scored with explicit documentary evidence. When a call receives a favorable (GO) opinion, the team knows exactly which strengths to emphasize and which annexes to attach.

Garanties tècniques auditades

  • Clear recommendation verdict (GO / NO-GO) with estimated award threshold
  • Weighted breakdown: Technical solvency (25/25), Methodology (35/40), Budget (28/35)
  • Informed team decisions in under 10 minutes per grant call

ADMISSIBILITY & TECHNICAL SOLVENCY OPINION

EXP: DSO-2026-0814 · BDNS: 742198 · DOGC no. 9114

Tender Opinion

GO · SUBMIT PROPOSAL
88/100

Estimated award threshold: 72/100 (+16 safety margin)

Tender criteria (Regulatory basis)WeightScoreEstat
1. Technical solvency and track record (Art. 7.1)25 pts25/25
Màx

Accredited 8 years of activity and 4 active agreements with public administrations.

2. Methodological consistency and action plan (Art. 7.2)40 pts35/40
Alineat

Demonstrated direct care methodology. Indicator monitoring table pending in annex 4.

3. Budget efficiency and cost per user (Art. 7.3)35 pts28/35
Alineat

Consistent direct costs. Private co-financing verified at 14% (recommended 18%).

Accredited administrative prerequisites (Art. 13 Law 38/2003)

  • Non-profit entity statutes and corporate purpose 100% aligned with the tender
  • Up-to-date AEAT and Social Security tax compliance certificates

Requirements to attach before final submission

  • Annex 2: Responsible declaration of subcontracting (limit below 50%)
  • Valid certificate of tax compliance with the competent tax agency
Algorithmic audit completed according to official DOGC no. 9114 scoring scale
PHASE 03 · STANDARDIZED DRAFTING & DOCUMENT INTEGRITY
WORD (.DOCX) FORMAT STRUCTURED BY WORK PACKAGES

Assisted technical proposal writing with zero invented data

Upon deciding to apply, the system generates the initial structured technical proposal draft in Microsoft Word (.docx), structured according to the work packages (WP) prescribed by the funding body.

Under our document security protocol, facts and territorial figures are never invented. Any reserved figures or organization-specific parameters are explicitly tagged with [TO COMPLETE] markers for human verification prior to electronic filing.

Garanties tècniques auditades

  • Standardized .docx format aligned with regional and ministerial templates
  • Zero hallucinations guarantee: strict [TO COMPLETE] security tags for unverified data
  • Up to 85% time saved when producing the initial technical proposal

TECHNICAL_MEMORANDUM_DSO_2026.docx

Structure aligned with Order DSO/124/2026 and DOGC no. 9114

WP1: Community diagnosis and need justification
Validated · 100% complete

This project addresses the housing vulnerability of individuals served in 2024-2025. According to verified IDESCAT statistics and annual records, the intervention territory exhibits an exclusion rate 4.2% higher than regional average.

WP2: Intervention plan and social-labour insertion paths
Security marker active

The intervention is organized into three modules: diagnostic intake, core skills training, and supervised workplace placement. The established ratio is [TO COMPLETE: technical staff ratio per participant as per sector collective agreement] staff members dedicated to a cohort of 25 users.

WP3: Execution timetable and project governance
Validated · 100% complete

Planned execution period: 1 February to 31 December 2026 (11 operational months). A bi-monthly technical monitoring steering committee is formed with executive management.

WP4: Detailed budget and eligible cost justification
Security marker active

Line item 1: Direct staff (Hourly cost social action agreement: 21.45 €/h). Line item 2: Indirect costs at flat rate 7% [TO COMPLETE: verify whether regulatory bases specify a maximum cap of 5% or 8% in Annex 4].

Document security control: 2 [TO COMPLETE] markers identified. Zero invented facts. Pre-electronic signature verification passed.

Managed service

Prefer that we manage it for you?

If you don't have a dedicated grants team - or simply want to delegate - our team handles everything: finding calls, evaluating fit, and preparing applications for you.

Learn more

No commitment. Reply within 24h.

Pilot phase

How we document results

We are preparing the first pilots with Third Sector organizations. We do not yet publish verified customer testimonials or outcomes.

  1. 01

    Starting point

    We record research time, calls reviewed, and applications submitted before the pilot.

  2. 02

    Follow-up

    We check calls against official sources and record the work completed during the pilot.

  3. 03

    Review and permission

    We will publish measurable results only after the organization reviews and explicitly authorizes them.

We do not attribute quotes, ratings, or figures to organizations without evidence and permission to publish them.

See the verification process

Plans & subscription

Transparent pricing for the Third Sector

Submit more grants with less team time - at a fraction of consultancy cost.

PLAN / 001

Essential

299 €/mo

For small NGOs wanting to stop missing out on grants without dedicating internal resources.

01Instant high-fit alerts + monthly summary report
02Access to all official sources (SEDIA, PLACSP, TED, BDNS)
03AI analysis report per alert
04Full Client Portal access
05Dedicated technical support
Start with Essential
PLAN / 002Most popular

Professional

499 €/mo

For mid-size NGOs actively applying for grants and needing agility plus AI drafting.

01Everything in Essential plan
02Weekly summary report
03Editable AI proposal draft + .docx export
0410-20 hours saved per grant proposal
05Urgent deadline alerts
Choose Professional
PLAN / 003

Partner

799 €/mo

For grant consultancies and federations managing multiple non-profit entities.

01Everything in Professional plan
02Continuous real-time monitoring
03Multiple client entities managed under one account
04Dedicated Account Manager for onboarding and support
05Monthly strategy review meeting
Contact sales
01
Estimated Return on Investment

A single €30,000 grant award covers over 5 years of the Professional subscription.

02
Service Commitment Clause

Service activation starts with full portal configuration and first validated alerts. No lock-in period.

Frequently Asked Questions

Clear answers to your questions

Everything you need to know about grant discovery, eligibility scoring, and AI proposal drafting.

We automatically monitor over 20 integrated official sources daily, including DOGC (Catalan Gazette), Barcelona City Council and Barcelona Provincial Council (CIDO), the RAISC registry, BDNS (National Grants DB), BOE, PLACSP, TED (Europe Tenders), and SEDIA (EU Funding & Tenders).
SERVICE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY

Start applying for public grants with technical rigor and legal certainty

Explore available calls and request a sample report based on your organization's activities.

Data handling information

Read the privacy notice and service terms to understand how your organization's information is handled.

Zero Model Training on Your Data

Your technical proposals, partnership agreements, and organization records are never used to train public models. Strict zero-retention policy for third parties.

Full Documentary Traceability

Every score and recommendation links directly to the official BDNS, DOGC, BOE, or tender specification reference number.

Specialized Third Sector Support

Dedicated specialists experienced in regional, ministerial, local, and EU recovery fund (NextGenEU, ESF+) grant management.

No credit card required to startStructured report delivered within 24hSupport in Catalan, Spanish, and English

FundingQuarry · Grant admissibility and management platform

Methodological framework aligned with Law 38/2003 (General Subsidies Act)