FundingQuarry vs Traditional Grant Consultancies
FundingQuarry vs. Traditional Consultancies
Traditional consultancies charge 15%-20% in success fees. FundingQuarry empowers your team with transparent AI technology at a flat fee.
Honest Comparison Table
Feature-by-feature evaluation between FundingQuarry and Traditional Grant Consultancies.
| Feature / Criterion | Traditional Grant Consultancies | FundingQuarry |
|---|---|---|
| Success fee on awarded grants | 15% - 20% of total grant | 0% fee (Flat subscription) |
| Direct ownership of IP and data | External dependency | 100% owned by NGO |
| First draft generation turnaround | 1 - 2 weeks | Instant (< 10 minutes) |
| 24/7 fit score availability | Business hours only | 24/7 Unlimited |
| Institutional memory retention | Stays with agency | Stays within NGO system |
When does Traditional Grant Consultancies make sense?
- Organizations with zero internal staff available to review or sign technical proposals.
- Highly diplomatic multi-national projects requiring direct lobby negotiations.
When does FundingQuarry clearly win?
- NGOs refusing to surrender thousands of euros of social funding to external agencies.
- Fundraising teams seeking to empower internal proposal managers.
- Entities managing multiple grant applications per year aiming to retain 100% of awarded funds.
Make the leap to smart grant management
Set up your account in under 2 minutes and see how much time your team can save.
Save Success Fees with FundingQuarry